Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:27:50PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> So put me in for +1 on the current development model.

I'ld like to also +1 the current development model.

However I think the 2.6.X should become 2.X; the 6 is starting to be
meaningless, and it's not going to be upgraded ever with the current
development model.

this leave 2.X.Y "namespace" to the current stable team (same
development model as the 2.6.X.Y).

-- 
Vincent Hanquez
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux