Re: [PATCH RT] don't let printk unconditionally turn on interrupts

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> could you check out the variant in 2.6.15-rt11 - i tweaked it slightly
> over yours, hopefully making the behavior more consistent.

I'll take a look Monday.

Thanks,

-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH RT] don't let printk unconditionally turn on interrupts
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH RT] don't let printk unconditionally turn on interrupts
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [BUG] Timer subsystem broken for Pentium M / early XEON / P6 family
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] acpiphp: treat dck separate from dock bridge
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RT] don't let printk unconditionally turn on interrupts
• Next by thread: [PATCH] doc: make doc. for maxcpus= more visible
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]