Re: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec

On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 02:19 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >    Cc: George Anzinger <[email protected]>
> >  From: George Anzinger <[email protected]>
> 
> How many email addresses does the man have, and which is preferred?

Sorry, my bad. I copied the wrong one into the cc-list

<[email protected]> is the correct one.

> >  In case of a negative nsec value the result of the division must be
> >  normalized.
> 
> What effect did this problem have?  oopses?  Userspace misbehaviour? ...

Both

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
  - From: George Anzinger <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
  - From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RT] don't let printk unconditionally turn on interrupts
Next by Date: Re: RFC [patch 00/34] PID Virtualization Overview
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
Next by thread: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]