Re: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
>    Cc: George Anzinger <george@wildturkeyfarm.net>
>  From: George Anzinger <george@wildturkeyranch.net>

How many email addresses does the man have, and which is preferred?

>  In case of a negative nsec value the result of the division must be
>  normalized.

What effect did this problem have?  oopses?  Userspace misbehaviour? ...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
  - From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

References:
- [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
  - From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] sg: simplify page_count manipulations
Next by Date: Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]