Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

On 2006-01-20T17:05:02, Michael Loftis <[email protected]> wrote:

> Right now as it sits, you have to bleed, or you don't get anything.  I 
> think some more middle ground can be found...I'm just not totally sure it's 
> wanted now after this line of discussion.

The usual suggestion: feel free to pick a kernel of your choice, and
keep maintaining it and backporting fixes to it, and make your tree
available for others.

You see, _nobody_ stops you (or someone else, for that matter) from
doing so. And if the need really exists, the users will come, and the
help with maintaining it will appear.

So far, people keep complaining that noone does it for them. Right. That
won't happen. If you want it, step up.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée

-- 
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business	 -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Marc Koschewski <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Michael Loftis <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Michael Loftis <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Michael Loftis <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Michael Loftis <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Michael Loftis <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: License oddity in some m68k files
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix IB with latest versions of udev
• Previous by thread: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
• Next by thread: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]