> Lots of things still out there depend on devfs. So now if I want to develop my
> kmod on recent kernels I have to be in the business of maintaining a lot more
> userland stuff, like mkinitrd, installers, etc. that have come to rely on
> devfs.
Just like the OSS-ALSA/e100 debate: If there IS something that you
do not like [something that requires devfs], why has NO ONE objected?
(Quoting Greg: "and I have not heard a single peep out of anyone about the
email titled "Subject: devfs going away, last chance to complain"") Not to
forget there is ndevfs if you really need it.
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
