Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Lots of things still out there depend on devfs.  So now if I want to develop my
> kmod on recent kernels I have to be in the business of maintaining a lot more
> userland stuff, like mkinitrd, installers, etc. that have come to rely on
> devfs.

Just like the OSS-ALSA/e100 debate: If there IS something that you 
do not like [something that requires devfs], why has NO ONE objected? 
(Quoting Greg: "and I have not heard a single peep out of anyone about the 
email titled "Subject: devfs going away, last chance to complain"") Not to 
forget there is ndevfs if you really need it.


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux