On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 12:10 -0700, Michael Loftis wrote:
> --On January 20, 2006 2:03:52 PM -0500 [email protected] wrote:
> > But you're perfectly happy to make the kernel developers do the
> > equivalent thing when they have to maintain 2 forks (a stable and devel).
> > Go back and look at the status of the 2.5 tree - there were *large*
> > chunks of time when 2.4 or 2.5 would get an important bugfix, but the
> > other tree wouldn't get it for *weeks* because of the hassle of
> > cross-porting the patch.
>
> Weeks is better than never, and still better than commercial vendors. ;)
Especially if someone else is doing the work (- to get back to the
point).
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
Embedded Linux Development and Services
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
