Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





--On January 20, 2006 2:03:52 PM -0500 [email protected] wrote:

But you're perfectly happy to make the kernel developers do the
equivalent thing when they have to maintain 2 forks (a stable and devel).
Go back and look at the status of the 2.5 tree - there were *large*
chunks of time when 2.4 or 2.5 would get an important bugfix, but the
other tree wouldn't get it for *weeks* because of the hassle of
cross-porting the patch.

Weeks is better than never, and still better than commercial vendors. ;)

--
"Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors
into trouble of all kinds."
-- Samuel Butler
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux