Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





--On January 20, 2006 5:35:51 PM +0100 Marc Koschewski <[email protected]> wrote:

Moreover, as far as I remember... my devfsd -> udev transsition went as
smooth as a reboot.

The one machine I've got running 2.6+devfs under debian chokes in initrd with an inability to find devfs during boot so I had to go back to static /dev entries for it since atleast in sarge right now I'm not seeing a quick-and-easy way to get devfs like support bundled via mkinitrd, but I haven't looked, and I shouldn't have to. It shouldn't have gone away in a stable kernel in teh first place. I realise things are changing, and need to change but that's called development, and belongs in a development tree.


Marc




--
"Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors
into trouble of all kinds."
-- Samuel Butler
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux