Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:14:56PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
On Iau, 2006-01-19 at 14:04 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Ah, ok, thanks, that makes sense. How about a simple pointer to the
license info from the .S files to the README file so that people (like
me), don't get confused again? I've attached a patch below if you wish
to apply it.
They specifically ask as is their right within the GPL that you note if
you modify the files. Otherwise seems fine.
Hm, any idea on how to note that I modified the file in such a way that
would be acceptable? How about this?
+|
+| For details on the license for this file, please see the
+| file, README, in this same directory. Note, this paragraph in
+| this comment has been added from the original version of this
+| file from the author.
thanks,
greg k-h
The language in the source files is pretty strong and this looks like Motorola should be asked to rerelease the files with a normal copyright notice in place of the current language...
ric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
