On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:11 -0800, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Could you look Mundt's patch, and see if it looks ok?
Not being on lkml, this was harder than it sounds, but I eventually
found the actual patch on marc. However, no, it doesn't look right.
This:
> + /* find space in the bitmap */
> + for (j = 0; j < span; j++)
> + if ((bitmap[index + j] & (mask << offset))) {
Is wrong. You're looking for an unset span of order bits at a given
offset. So you get the byte offset for the first, then all the
following bitmap[n] need to be zero until you need to do an offset in
reverse for the last bit. i.e. (assuming BITS_PER_LONG=32) for a span
of 126 at offset 1, you check
bitmap[0] & 0xfffffffe == 0
bitmap[1] & 0xffffffff == 0
bitmap[2] & 0xffffffff == 0
bitmap[3] & 0x7fffffff == 0
and so on.
> + space = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* keep looking */
> + if (unlikely(!space))
> + continue;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < span; j++)
> + /* set region in bitmap */
> + bitmap[index + j] |= (mask << offset);
Likewise, you'd have to or in what you checked above.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]