Re: [PATCH] prototypes for *at functions & typo fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 20:37 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Do we really need the __NR_ia32_* macros?  The userlevel on x86-64 should be bi-arch and provide the native ia32 unistd.h.
> 
> I'd have thought that x86 and x86_64 could source-level-share the syscall
> table, yes.  ppc manages to.

AMD64 renumbered all the syscalls for optimal cacheline usage or
something stupid like that. I suppose the x86 emulation on AMD64 kernels
could share the i386 table, but then _NR_foo will have a different value
depending on context, and that'll just get confusing.

-- 
Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux