Re: [PATCH] prototypes for *at functions & typo fix

Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Do we really need the __NR_ia32_* macros?  The userlevel on x86-64 should be bi-arch and provide the native ia32 unistd.h.

I'd have thought that x86 and x86_64 could source-level-share the syscall
table, yes.  ppc manages to.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] prototypes for *at functions & typo fix
    • From: Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] prototypes for *at functions & typo fix
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] turn on might_sleep() in early bootup code too
• Next by Date: RE: clarity on kref needed.
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] prototypes for *at functions & typo fix
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] prototypes for *at functions & typo fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]