Re: [PATCH] prototypes for *at functions & typo fix

Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Do we really need the __NR_ia32_* macros?  The userlevel on x86-64 should be bi-arch and provide the native ia32 unistd.h.

I'd have thought that x86 and x86_64 could source-level-share the syscall
table, yes.  ppc manages to.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] prototypes for *at functions & typo fix
  - From: Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] prototypes for *at functions & typo fix
  - From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] turn on might_sleep() in early bootup code too
Next by Date: RE: clarity on kref needed.
Previous by thread: [PATCH] prototypes for *at functions & typo fix
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] prototypes for *at functions & typo fix
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]