On Tuesday 17 January 2006 04:32, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:24:31AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > ~25 %? Good! Which is delay vs. host?
>
> Delay vs a UML without the patch.
>
> > A curiosity - did you look at the similar code in Ingo Molnar's VCPU
> > patch? I never found the time to split it out and compare differencies. I
> > just remember it using assembler inserts for (maybe atomic) bitmask
> > manipulations.
>
> It was separate from VCPU,
conceptually, but I got only a blob comprising everything - never seen it
splitout (or maybe I split that out and forgot?)
> but I never really looked at it since I already
> had this. Some day I will to see if there are any trick in it that I
> should use.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
