Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 9/11] UML - Implement soft interrupts

[Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>]

On Tuesday 17 January 2006 04:32, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:24:31AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > ~25 %? Good! Which is delay vs. host?
>
> Delay vs a UML without the patch.
>
> > A curiosity - did you look at the similar code in Ingo Molnar's VCPU
> > patch? I never found the time to split it out and compare differencies. I
> > just remember it using assembler inserts for (maybe atomic) bitmask
> > manipulations.
>
> It was separate from VCPU,
conceptually, but I got only a blob comprising everything - never seen it 
splitout (or maybe I split that out and forgot?)

> but I never really looked at it since I already 
> had this.  Some day I will to see if there are any trick in it that I
> should use.

-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/