Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 9/11] UML - Implement soft interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:24:31AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> ~25 %? Good! Which is delay vs. host?

Delay vs a UML without the patch.

> A curiosity - did you look at the similar code in Ingo Molnar's VCPU patch? 
> I never found the time to split it out and compare differencies. I just 
> remember it using assembler inserts for (maybe atomic) bitmask manipulations.

It was separate from VCPU, but I never really looked at it since I already
had this.  Some day I will to see if there are any trick in it that I should
use.

				Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux