On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 01:52:44AM -0700, Zan Lynx wrote: > A laptop user could also bind a process to a single CPU, and use the > scaling min/max values to lock CPU speed to a single value. The TSC may > still stop during HLT, but software must be handling that already. > > Wouldn't that provide an accurate TSC? monotonic but not linear. Also remember that the OS will use rdtsc here and there, and you can't affine the OS :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- References:
- Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com>
- Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: thockin@hockin.org
- Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com>
- Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@mvista.com>
- Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com>
- Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
- Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com>
- Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Zan Lynx <zlynx@acm.org>
- Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- Prev by Date: Re: wireless: recap of current issues (configuration)
- Next by Date: Re: So - What's going on with Reiser 4?
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- Next by thread: Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- Index(es):
![]() |