Re: [robust-futex-1] futex: robust futex support

On 1/14/06, david singleton <[email protected]> wrote:
> can you suggest some error codes you like to use?  I'll use
> whatever you suggest.

How about EADDRNOTAVAIL.  The error message kind of makes sense, even
though "address" is misused.  And there definitely won't be a clash
with other error codes because it's currently only used in network
contexts.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • [robust-futex-3] futex: robust futex support
    • From: david singleton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [robust-futex-1] futex: robust futex support
    • From: David Singleton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [robust-futex-1] futex: robust futex support
    • From: David Singleton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [robust-futex-1] futex: robust futex support
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
  • Re: [robust-futex-1] futex: robust futex support
    • From: david singleton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.15-mm4] sem2mutex: infiniband, #2
• Next by Date: [PATCH] pci_ids: remove duplicates gathered during merge period
• Previous by thread: Re: [robust-futex-1] futex: robust futex support
• Next by thread: Re: [robust-futex-1] futex: robust futex support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]