Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15

Matan Peled <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Andrew, I'm looking at this:
> 
>  http://source.mvista.com/~dsingleton/robust-futex-1
> 
>  And it doesn't seem to have a futex_deadlock function at all. In fact, its seems 
>  to have a rather lengthy description about robust futexes and why they're a Good 
>  Thing(TM).
> 
>  What are you looking at?

A file which now appears to have been deleted..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re [robust-futex-2] : interdiff for memory leak fix
    • From: david singleton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15
    • From: Matan Peled <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI update for 2.6.15
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add ide_bus_type probe and remove methods
• Previous by thread: Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15
• Next by thread: Re [robust-futex-2] : interdiff for memory leak fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]