On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> This should represent the final pieces of SCSI for the merge window.
This is a final warning.
If the next SCSI merge tries to come in the day before the release window
closes, I WILL SIMPLY IGNORE IT, and the damn thing can wait until next
release.
We discussed this last time around. You guys had SIX WEEKS of calming-down
time during the last tree to do your SCSI development. Instead, you're
apparently AGAIN trying to cram it into the two weeks when merges are
supposed to happen, and then going in under the radar the day before I'm
about to do a -rc1, so that we won't have any time at all to fix even
obvious problems, is not how it's supposed to work.
So as far as big SCSI merges (and I'm seriously considering this same
policy for networking too, because it worked so badly this time around) is
concerned, they'd better be ready in the _first_ week of the two-week
window, simply because I'm fed up with this last-minute thing.
The point of having a TWO WEEK merge window is not that you use two weeks
for development, and then merge the last possible chance. Not at all. The
point of giving people two weeks is so that people don't have to be
totally synchronized - somebody can be on vacation, some problem could
have cropped up that people wanted fixed first, etc etc.
So next time around: merge in the first week. And you can merge more than
once, so if there's something missing MERGE ANYWAY, for christ sake! Then,
if you have a small further feature the last day, at least it's _small_,
and most of the new stuff has been getting some testing.
I'm pissed off. No more of these "developer limbo dance" games. I thought
it was clear last time around.
And hell yes, I'm serious. The SCSI merge window next time is one week.
Not a day more. After that first week, you get an additional _smaller_
merge window of another week for smaller new features. Because I'm not
going to take this a third time in a row.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
