Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench

On Saturday 14 January 2006 16:03, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Ideally, balancing should be completely unaffected when all tasks are
> of priority 0 which is what I thought yours did, and why I think the
> current system is not great.

The current smp nice in mainline 2.6.15 is performance neutral when all are 
the same priority. It's only this improved version in -mm that is not.

Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• References:
  • -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: nlm_udpport vs. udpport vs lockd.nlm_udpport vs etc.
• Next by Date: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
• Previous by thread: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
• Next by thread: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]