On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:23:58PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> In my experience with scheduling OSS drivers for removal, users simply
> use the OSS drivers unless you tell them very explicitely that the OSS
> driver will go.
If the OSS drivers satisfy them, what's wrong with it?
> It shouldn't be too hard to port the support to ALSA if someone with the
> hardware is willing to test patches.
Unfortunately, I have a different trident variant (the 5451).
> The goal is to get people still using OSS drivers where ALSA drivers
> support the same hardware to use the ALSA drivers - and if there were
> bugs in the ALSA drivers preventing them to switch to ALSA, to report
> them to the ALSA bug tracking system.
>
> This has the following advantages:
> - better ALSA drivers
This one is fine.
> - get rid of some unmaintained code in the kernel
This one is irrelevant for trident - I maintain it.
Cheers,
Muli
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
