On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:42:10PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 23:00 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > CYBER5050 is discussed in ALSA bug #1293 (tester wanted).
>
> OK I set that bug to FEEDBACK, but it's open 5 months now and no testers
> are forthcoming. I think if we don't find one as a result of this
> thread we can assume no one cares about this hardware anymore.
>
> I'm still not sure that just adding it to the ALSA driver and hoping it
> works is the best solution. Would we rather users see right away that
> their hardware isn't supported, or have the driver load and get no sound
> or hang the machine?
... or use the known working OSS driver?
> I think the best approach might just be to drop it in lieu of a tester.
> It will be trivial to add support later if someone finds one of these
> boxes.
So you advocate removing a known working driver in favor of a known
not to be working driver? nice.
Cheers,
Muli
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
