Con Kolivas wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:35 pm, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
Martin Bligh wrote:
This is a shot in the dark. We haven't confirmed 1. there is a
problem 2. that this is the problem nor 3. that this patch will fix
the problem. I say we wait for the results of 1. If the improved smp
nice handling patch ends up being responsible then it should not be
merged upstream, and then this patch can be tested on top.
Martin I know your work move has made it not your responsibility to
test backing out this change, but are you aware of anything being
done to test this hypothesis?
OK, backing out that patch seems to fix it. Thanks Andy ;-)
Yes thanks!
I just noticed the result myself and emailed on another branch of this email
thread. Gah
It would nice to get a run with the patch back in and my fix applied.
Peter
--
Peter Williams [email protected]
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
