On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:35 pm, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Martin Bligh wrote:
> >> This is a shot in the dark. We haven't confirmed 1. there is a
> >> problem 2. that this is the problem nor 3. that this patch will fix
> >> the problem. I say we wait for the results of 1. If the improved smp
> >> nice handling patch ends up being responsible then it should not be
> >> merged upstream, and then this patch can be tested on top.
> >>
> >> Martin I know your work move has made it not your responsibility to
> >> test backing out this change, but are you aware of anything being
> >> done to test this hypothesis?
>
> OK, backing out that patch seems to fix it. Thanks Andy ;-)
Yes thanks!
I just noticed the result myself and emailed on another branch of this email
thread. Gah
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
