On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 11:01 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > Oh, I think you're misunderstanding Andrew's idea. Just create a > generic __raw_memcpy_toio32() that is always compiled, but mark it > with attribute((weak)). Then x86_64 can define its own version of > __raw_memcpy_toio32(), which will override the weak generic version. No, I understood that. But my original x86_64 routine was inline, which would have left the out-of-line version compiled, but not used, on x86_64. <b - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-mm3
- Next by Date: Re: Is user-space AIO dead?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- Index(es):