On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:20:32AM -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 15:32 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Unless someone can think of a problem with attribute(weak), I think you'll > > find that it's the simplest-by-far solution. > > The only problem I can see with this is that on x86_64 and other > platforms that reimplement the routine as an inline function, I think > we'll be left with a small hunk of dead code in the form of the > out-of-line version in lib/ that never gets referenced. If it is not referenced the linker should not pull it in from lib.a - no? Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- Prev by Date: Re: FAT and Microsoft patent?
- Next by Date: Re: mm/rmap.c negative page map count BUG.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
- Index(es):