In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 at 22:07:44 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> --- linux.orig/include/asm-i386/mutex.h
> +++ linux/include/asm-i386/mutex.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,13 @@ do { \
> \
> __asm__ __volatile__( \
> LOCK " decl (%%eax) \n" \
> - " js "#fail_fn" \n" \
> + " js 2f \n" \
> + "1: \n" \
> + \
> + LOCK_SECTION_START("") \
> + "2: call "#fail_fn" \n" \
> + " jmp 1b \n" \
> + LOCK_SECTION_END \
> \
> :"=a" (dummy) \
> : "a" (count) \
But now it's inefficient again.
Why not this:
LOCK " decl (%%eax) \n" \
" jns 1f \n" \
" call "#fail_fn" \n" \
"1: \n" \
\
:"=a" (dummy) \
: "a" (count) \
Will the extra taken forward conditional jump in the fastpath cause much of
a slowdown?
--
Chuck
Currently reading: _Olympos_ by Dan Simmons
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]