Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:41 pm, Martin Bligh wrote:
> Seems to have gone wrong between 2.6.14-rc1-mm1 and 2.6.14-rc2-mm1 ?
> See http://test.kernel.org/perf/kernbench.moe.png for clearest effect.

The only new scheduler patch at that time was this:
+sched-modified-nice-support-for-smp-load-balancing.patch

which was Peter's modifications to my smp nice support. cc'ed Peter

I guess we need to check whether reversing this patch helps.

Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>

• References:
  • -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
• Next by Date: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
• Previous by thread: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
• Next by thread: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]