Martin Bligh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> OK, I fixed the graphs so you can actually read them now ;-)
They're cute.
> http://test.kernel.org/perf/kernbench.elm3b6.png (x86_64 4x)
> http://test.kernel.org/perf/kernbench.moe.png (NUMA-Q)
> http://test.kernel.org/perf/kernbench.elm3b132.png (4x SMP ia32)
>
> Both seems significantly slower on -mm (mm is green line)
Well, 1% slower. -mm has permanent not-for-linus debug things, some of
which are expected to have a performance impact. I don't know whether
they'd have a 1% impact though.
> If I look at diffprofile between 2.6.15 and 2.6.15-mm1, it just looks
> like we have lots more idle time.
Yes, we do. It'd be useful to test -git7..
> You got strange scheduler changes in
> there, that you've been carrying for a long time (2.6.14-mm1 at least)?
> or HZ piddling? See to be mainly getting much more idle time.
Yes, there are CPU scheduler changes, although much fewer than usual.
Ingo, any suggestions as to a culprit?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
