Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time

El Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:33:56 -0500,
"D. Hazelton" <[email protected]> escribió:

> This is true. The types of bounties I have seen in OS development do not 
> usually reach much beyond $500. If distro's were to get behind this and start 

Well - just pay for redhat/suse/whatever license, you can ask them to 
fix the problem. That's why they exist in first place.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
  - From: Boxer Gnome <[email protected]>
- Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
  - From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>
- Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
  - From: "D. Hazelton" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: X86_64 and X86_32 bit performance difference [Revisited]
Next by Date: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
Previous by thread: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
Next by thread: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]