On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 06:16:30PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 11:09:59PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:30:32PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:10:13PM +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > > > If unsure, say N.
> > > > ===========
> > > >
> > > > I think I'll say M - for now ;)
> > >
> > > If you choose something depending on CONFIGFS_FS, you of course
> > > don't get the choice of 'N'. Here's a cleanup also available at
> > > http://oss.oracle.com/git/ocfs2-dev.git
> >
> > I don't know whether I already asked this question (if I did it seems
> > I've forgotten the answer...):
> >
> > Why is CONFIGFS_FS a user-visible option?
>
> I think it should be the same as SYSFS, only changable from the EMBEDDED
> portion.
No, my thoughts got in exactly the opposite direction:
It should not be available except when explicitely select'ed by a driver
with support for it.
But I got the point that an option is required for stuff not yet merged
into the kernel.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
