On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 11:09:59PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:30:32PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:10:13PM +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > > If unsure, say N.
> > > ===========
> > >
> > > I think I'll say M - for now ;)
> >
> > If you choose something depending on CONFIGFS_FS, you of course
> > don't get the choice of 'N'. Here's a cleanup also available at
> > http://oss.oracle.com/git/ocfs2-dev.git
>
> I don't know whether I already asked this question (if I did it seems
> I've forgotten the answer...):
>
> Why is CONFIGFS_FS a user-visible option?
I think it should be the same as SYSFS, only changable from the EMBEDDED
portion.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
