Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2006/1/9, Erik Andersen <[email protected]>:
> On Mon Jan 09, 2006 at 03:54:24PM +0800, Boxer Gnome wrote:
> > and the dos ntfs driver was not released by the MS offical.So,what' wrong?
> >
> > Somebody who can explain this ?
>
> Sure, thats easy.  You havn't paid Anton and Richard to quit
> their jobs to work full time on finishing full linux ntfs
> support.  It is really quite amazing how many "linux can't do foo"
> type problems could be quickly solved by sending large amounts of
> money to the right people.
>
>  -Erik
>
> --
> Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
> --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
>
But the dos' ntfs drive was free software,no ne need pay.

I see, the ntfs' spec is not so hard to know.I always think it hard to
be supported before, for the ntfs' spec belongs to MS.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux