Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time

On Mon Jan 09, 2006 at 03:54:24PM +0800, Boxer Gnome wrote:
> and the dos ntfs driver was not released by the MS offical.So,what' wrong?
> 
> Somebody who can explain this ?

Sure, thats easy.  You havn't paid Anton and Richard to quit
their jobs to work full time on finishing full linux ntfs
support.  It is really quite amazing how many "linux can't do foo"
type problems could be quickly solved by sending large amounts of
money to the right people.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
  - From: Yaroslav Rastrigin <[email protected]>
- Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
  - From: Boxer Gnome <[email protected]>

References:
- Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
  - From: Boxer Gnome <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: RE: git pull on Linux/ACPI release tree
Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] schedule obsolete OSS drivers for removal
Previous by thread: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
Next by thread: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]