>> >> Why is CONFIGFS_FS a user-visible option?
>> >
>> >I think it should be the same as SYSFS, only changable from the EMBEDDED
>> >portion.
>> >
>> At its present state, no distribution uses configfs afaik, so I'd love to
>> have that turned off to not enlarge the kernel binary unnecessary.
>
>Well, ocfs2 needs it, and as that just hit mainline, it's a bit unfair
>to state that no distro uses it (and I think that it's even untrue, look
>for the distros that ship ocfs2...)
Well ok. What I mean is: I don't want to have configfs if I do not also
want ocfs2.
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.15-git2: CONFIGFS_FS shows up as M/y choice, help says "if unsure, say N"
- Re: 2.6.15-git2: CONFIGFS_FS shows up as M/y choice, help says "if unsure, say N"
- Re: 2.6.15-git2: CONFIGFS_FS shows up as M/y choice, help says "if unsure, say N"
- Re: 2.6.15-git2: CONFIGFS_FS shows up as M/y choice, help says "if unsure, say N"
- Re: 2.6.15-git2: CONFIGFS_FS shows up as M/y choice, help says "if unsure, say N"
- Re: 2.6.15-git2: CONFIGFS_FS shows up as M/y choice, help says "if unsure, say N"
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]