RE: 2.6.15-mm2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 
>> 2.6.15 and 2.6.15-git3 both don't show any of these issues. 
>> Did acpi and cpufreq get merged after -git3 ?
>> 
>
>Well whatever bug it is, it's in Linus's tree now.  Happens for me too.
>
>I traced the failure down as far as acpi_processor_get_performance_info(),
>where it's failing here:
>
>	status = acpi_get_handle(pr->handle, "_PCT", &handle);
>	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
>				  "ACPI-based processor 
>performance control unavailable\n"));
>		return_VALUE(-ENODEV);
>	}

No, acpi was not merged after 2.6.15 -- see if cpufreq changed.

-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux