>>>2) acpi-cpufreq does not load either, returns ENODEV too.
>>>It's probably git-acpi. I tried to revert it but there are
>>>lots of other patches depending on it, so I finally gave up.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Brice,
>>Can you try the converse?
>>Apply the acpi patch (which is included in -mm)
>>without the rest of the mm tree to see if that broke acpi-cpufreq?:
>>
>>http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patche
>s/test/2.6.15/acpi-test-20051216-2.6.15.diff.bz2
>>
>>thanks,
>>-Len
>>
>>
>
>Len,
>
>This patch applied on top of 2.6.15 breaks acpi-cpufreq in the
>same way.
Ah good!
Can you test the _PDC patch here all by itself?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5483#c17
If this patch is what causes the failure, please
build with CONFIG_ACP_DEBUG=y and attach the dmesg
from the failure, as well as the output from acpidump,
available in the latest pmtools here:
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils
thanks,
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]