On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > This trend is extremely alarming!!
>
> It scares me a bit, too.
> I think we should start with string-based interface, with just two
> states ("on" and "off"). That is easily extensible into future, and
> suits current PCMCIA nicely. It also allows us to experiment with PCI
> power management... I can cook up a patch, but it will be simple
> reintroduction of .../power file under different name.
That sounds good to me, provided you add to dev_pm_info a pointer to an
array of string pointers, the names of the available states. For now all
devices can share a single array with just two entries ("on" and "off",
or even "0" and "2"). In the future, bus drivers will be able to
substitute a pointer to a private array with device-specific state names.
Of course, this change will require you to add something like
const char *name;
to the pm_message_t struct. PM-aware drivers will be able to use it to
see which state was requested, and other drivers can ignore it.
In fact, for PM-aware drivers the name field makes the event field
unnecessary. But until all drivers are PM-aware we can't get rid of it.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
