On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:13 am, Peter Williams wrote:
> If the plugsched patches were included in -mm we could get wider testing
> of alternative scheduling mechanisms. But I think it will take a lot of
> testing of the new schedulers to allay fears that they may introduce new
> problems of their own.
When I first generated plugsched and posted it to lkml for inclusion in -mm it
was blocked as having no chance of being included by both Ingo and Linus and
I doubt they've changed their position since then. As you're well aware this
is why I gave up working on it and let you maintain it since then. Obviously
I thought it was a useful feature or I wouldn't have worked on it.
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
