>> historical and political reasons, not technical ones. When
>> performance raises its ugly head and you end up having to listen to
>> engineers again you end up with DRI and that:
>>
>> Module Size Used by
>> nvidia 3464380 12
>
>That isn't DRI. DRI is a good deal smaller than the crazy nvidia stuff.
>
>radeon 81089 1
>drm 83433 2 radeon
>
>.. speaks volumes doesn't it 8)
What nvidia version number is that? I remember it being over 5 megs in size. Oh
BTW, that's one GOOD REASON for me to believe having certain parts in userspace
(e.g. X was mentioned) being a good thing - after all, you can't swap kernel
memory. If nvidia continued like that, their kernel module would eventually
exceed the amount of RAM that is apparently installed.
>> X is a beautiful example of how things should not have been done. Its
>> only redeeming quality is that it exists and works, and that's
>> definitively a non-negligible one.
>
>X servers have been implemented a variety of ways involving mixed user
>and kernel space environments, user space only, pure kernel space, and
>even downloading the server onto a graphics coprocessor and talking X
>protocol to it.
Jan Engelhardt
--
| Alphagate Systems, http://alphagate.hopto.org/
| jengelh's site, http://jengelh.hopto.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
