Re: [2.6 patch] schedule obsolete OSS drivers for removal

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:24:49PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 05:16:13PM +0000, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > This argument is basically watered down with devfs, udev, sysfs, etc. which 
> > all have exactly the same issues. Should a crippled OSS API be the way 
> > forward for Linux? I think not.
> 
> And they're getting some real backlash because of that now.  Hell,
> Linus' message was about udev in the first place.

The udev breakages might not have been nice, but OSS/ALSA is a 
completely different issue:

OSS has been deprecated since ALSA was merged into the Linux kernel 
_four years ago_.

And I'm only talking about removing drivers _with ALSA drivers for the 
same hardware available_.

> As for the OSS API being crippled, I'd take the 3 ioctl calls you need
> to setup a simple stereo 16bits output with OSS than the 13 ALSA
> library calls anyday.  Especially with the impressive lack of
> documentation you get about what the hell is a period, or what you can
> do except aborting when you get an error.
>...

For a general OSS<->ALSA discussion, you are five years too late.

>   OG.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/