Re: [PATCH 0/15] Ubuntu patch sync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 15:46 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 17:45 -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > After dealing with literally dozens of upstream drivers, I think the
> > reasons boil down to a few categories:
> 
> > <...>
> 
> You missed one:
> 
> 5 - They've implemented Yet Another IEEE802.11 stack instead of
> embracing and extending the Intel one we already have, and are hence
> urinating into the atmospheric disturbance.
> 
> That's one of the reasons why I merged bcm43xx and softmac into the
> Fedora kernel and none of the others, FWIW -- Johannes is actually
> working on improving what we have in the kernel, rather than just saying
> "You have to throw it all away because $MYSTACK is better". So I figure
> softmac has a _much_ better chance of going upstream, even if its
> feature list isn't quite as comprehensive yet.

Yeah, I did the same for bcm43xx (it's in the ubuntu tree, and working
on my powerbook right now with wep :)

Didn't notice softmac had a git tree now. And here I am pulling from
mercurial and hand merging :/

> http://softmac.sipsolutions.net/softmac-2.6.git

-- 
   Ben Collins <[email protected]>
   Developer
   Ubuntu Linux

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux