>> > These patches are just attempts to merge code from the ubuntu kernel tree.
>> > This is most of the differences between our tree and stock code (not
>> > necessarily all differences, since we do have a lot of external drivers
>> > pulled in).
>>
>> Why not submit them too?
>
>Because neither I nor Ubuntu maintains them as upstream. I would rather
>leave it to the upstream authors of those drivers (e.g. rt2400, rt2500,
>unionfs, etc.) to submit their own code to Linus.
The maximum where unionfs should IMO go ATM is -mm, because it still has
refcount issues and occassional crashes.
rt2400/etc is a bit more tricky. There exist several versions and they
all have different levels of evolution :-/
Group 1:
- rt* from ralink.com.tw
Group 2:
- rt2400,rt2500,rt2570 "1.1.0" from sf.net/projects/rt2400
- rt2x00 "2.0", also sf.net/projects/rt2400
Nevertheless, I do have rt* 1.1 and 2.0, and unionfs in my patchset...
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
