Re: [Patch] New zone ZONE_EASY_RECLAIM take 4. (disable gfp_easy_reclaim bit)[5/8]

> 
> > ===================================================================
> > --- zone_reclaim.orig/fs/pipe.c	2005-12-16 18:36:20.000000000 +0900
> > +++ zone_reclaim/fs/pipe.c	2005-12-16 19:15:35.000000000 +0900
> > @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ pipe_writev(struct file *filp, const str
> >  			int error;
> >  
> >  			if (!page) {
> > -				page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER);
> > +				page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER & ~__GFP_EASY_RECLAIM);
> >  				if (unlikely(!page)) {
> >  					ret = ret ? : -ENOMEM;
> >  					break;
> 
> That is a bit hard to understand.  How about a new GFP_HIGHUSER_HARD or 
> somesuch define back in patch 1, then use it here?

It looks better. Thanks for your idea.

-- 
Yasunori Goto 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Patch] New zone ZONE_EASY_RECLAIM take 4. (disable gfp_easy_reclaim bit)[5/8]
    • From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)

• References:
  • Re: [Patch] New zone ZONE_EASY_RECLAIM take 4. (disable gfp_easy_reclaim bit)[5/8]
    • From: Joel Schopp <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Patch] New zone ZONE_EASY_RECLAIM take 4. (change build_zonelists)[3/8]
• Next by Date: Re: bad pmd filemap.c, oops; 2.4.30 and 2.4.32
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] New zone ZONE_EASY_RECLAIM take 4. (disable gfp_easy_reclaim bit)[5/8]
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch] New zone ZONE_EASY_RECLAIM take 4. (disable gfp_easy_reclaim bit)[5/8]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]