jeff shia <[email protected]> wrote: > > en, Please see http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/top-posting.txt > You mean in some pagefault place we do schedule()? We used to - that should no longer be the case. The TASK_RUNNING thing is probably redundant now. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what is the state of current after an mm_fault occurs?
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: what is the state of current after an mm_fault occurs?
- References:
- what is the state of current after an mm_fault occurs?
- From: jeff shia <[email protected]>
- Re: what is the state of current after an mm_fault occurs?
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: what is the state of current after an mm_fault occurs?
- From: jeff shia <[email protected]>
- what is the state of current after an mm_fault occurs?
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/21] mutex subsystem, -V14
- Next by Date: Re: mouse issues in 2.6.15-rc5-mm series
- Previous by thread: Re: what is the state of current after an mm_fault occurs?
- Next by thread: Re: what is the state of current after an mm_fault occurs?
- Index(es):
 |