On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:36:10PM +0000, Nick Warne wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2006 22:30, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > > (according to kernel.org). Yet there is no upgrade path for that build
> > > (or any other .x releases)
> > >
> > > It is a bit of a mess really.
> >
> > but, a 2.6.14.6 kernel might come out *after* 2.6.15, then what?
>
> Nightmares...
It's already happened, we did a 2.6.13.y release after 2.6.14 was out,
and I'm about to do a 2.6.14.y release in a few days too :)
> I get all the points. Let me say then it needs better distinction on
> what the 'latest kernel' is and on what the 'latest -stable' is.
Ok, exactly how would you like this to be shown?
Again, 2.6.15 is the latest stable kernel right now. Just because there
isn't a .1 release yet, doesn't mean it isn't.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
