On Wednesday 04 January 2006 22:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > Then when 2.6.15 came out, that was it! No patch for the 'latest stable
> > kernel release 2.6.14.5'. It was GONE!
>
> That's because 2.6.15 is the latest stable release.
>
> > OK, I suppose we are all capable of getting back to where we are on
> > rebuilding to latest 'stable', but there _is_ a missing link for somebody
> > that doesn't know - and I think backtracking patches isn't really the way
> > to go if the 'latest stable release' isn't catered for.
>
> Um, it is, see my sentance above. And if you want to download older
> stable releases, you can jump to the proper directory, how long do you
> want us to put older stable releases on the main page for? :)
OK, I see what you mean, but 2.6.14 wasn't the latest 'release' - 2.6.14.5 was
(according to kernel.org). Yet there is no upgrade path for that build (or
any other .x releases)
It is a bit of a mess really.
Nick
--
"Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it."
-Chinese Proverb
My quake2 project:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/quake2plus/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
