Re: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch

[Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au>]

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 19:13:08 +0100, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 1/4/06, Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> wrote:
>> Jesper Juhl wrote:
>> >
>> >>but the incremental patches do appear to be in
>> >>  http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/incr/
>> ..
>> >
>> > Hmm, yes, you are right. I was not aware of those. When did those
>> > start to apear?
>> > Guess I need to update applying-patches.txt if those are automated...
>>
>> That's how Greg posts them to LKML also -- as incremental patches.
>>
>Yes, I know that's what he posts them on LKML, I just never knew that
>they got archived on kernel.org in incr. form as well.  Now I know :-)

Easy to revert 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.14 then patch to 2.6.15 if you follow 
the stable series.  Still saves ~30MB downloading source.

Because I'm also compiling the -rc? and -mm? I keep 2.6.14 tree and use 
hardlink trees, when 2.6.15 came out I patched the 2.6.14 to 2.6.15 
and deleted the development trees -- works for me ;)

And no, I'll not automate this, it's enough dealing with finger trouble 
let alone scripts doing things behind my back!  I have vim trained to 
break hardlink files on write, I don't get myself in trouble so much.

Grant.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/