On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 19:13:08 +0100, Jesper Juhl <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 1/4/06, Mark Lord <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Jesper Juhl wrote:
>> >
>> >>but the incremental patches do appear to be in
>> >> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/incr/
>> ..
>> >
>> > Hmm, yes, you are right. I was not aware of those. When did those
>> > start to apear?
>> > Guess I need to update applying-patches.txt if those are automated...
>>
>> That's how Greg posts them to LKML also -- as incremental patches.
>>
>Yes, I know that's what he posts them on LKML, I just never knew that
>they got archived on kernel.org in incr. form as well. Now I know :-)
Easy to revert 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.14 then patch to 2.6.15 if you follow
the stable series. Still saves ~30MB downloading source.
Because I'm also compiling the -rc? and -mm? I keep 2.6.14 tree and use
hardlink trees, when 2.6.15 came out I patched the 2.6.14 to 2.6.15
and deleted the development trees -- works for me ;)
And no, I'll not automate this, it's enough dealing with finger trouble
let alone scripts doing things behind my back! I have vim trained to
break hardlink files on write, I don't get myself in trouble so much.
Grant.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
