On Wednesday 04 January 2006 17:40, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > I went from 2.6.14 -> 2.6.14.2 -> .2-.3 -> .3-.4 -> .4-.5
>
> If you did that you did it wrong. The -stable patches are *not*
> incremental, they all apply to the base 2.6.x kernel.
nick@linuxamd:kernel$ ls -lsa | grep patch
24 -rw-r--r-- 1 nick users 20572 2005-11-11 06:07 patch-2.6.14.2
48 -rw-r--r-- 1 nick users 46260 2005-11-24 22:15 patch-2.6.14.3
24 -rw-r--r-- 1 nick users 22725 2005-12-15 00:27 patch-2.6.14.3-4
20 -rw-r--r-- 1 nick users 18651 2005-12-27 00:29 patch-2.6.14.4-5
Nick
--
"Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it."
-Chinese Proverb
My quake2 project:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/quake2plus/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
