Re: [PATCH] fix warning in 8250.c

[Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>]

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:18:01PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:14:25PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:12:48AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > >   CC      drivers/serial/8250.o
> > > /.1/usr/srcdevel/kernel/linux-2.6.15-rc7.src/drivers/serial/8250.c:1085: warning: 'transmit_chars' declared inline after being called
> > > /.1/usr/srcdevel/kernel/linux-2.6.15-rc7.src/drivers/serial/8250.c:1085: warning: previous declaration of 'transmit_chars' was here
> > > 
> > > Since this function is not small, inlining effect is way below noise floor.
> > > Let's just remove _INLINE_.
> > 
> > I think we want to remove _INLINE_ from both receive_chars and
> > transmit_chars.  Both functions aren't small, so...
> 
> While we're at it can we please kill _INLINE_?  Those functions that should
> be inlined can become inline, but this macro just obsfucates the serial code.

No idea - I don't know about x86 nuances and why they wanted:

#if defined(__i386__) && (defined(CONFIG_M386) || defined(CONFIG_M486))
#define _INLINE_ inline
#else
#define _INLINE_
#endif

Maybe someone in the x86 world needs to comment?  Does the above even
mean that we'll ever inline anything marked _INLINE_ ?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/